{"id":652,"date":"2014-11-28T19:25:20","date_gmt":"2014-11-28T19:25:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/?p=652"},"modified":"2017-09-09T11:57:04","modified_gmt":"2017-09-09T11:57:04","slug":"why-we-need-a-neutral-internet-exhibit-a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/why-we-need-a-neutral-internet-exhibit-a\/","title":{"rendered":"Why We Need a Neutral Internet, Exhibit A"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I received an email from Verizon a few days ago, stating several FOX channels are\u00a0no longer available because &#8220;<em>Verizon refused to accept an agreement that contained rates that are not in our customers\u2019 best interests<\/em>&#8220;. \u00a0Presumably, FOX wanted more than Verizon was willing to pay. \u00a0(In cable TV, it&#8217;s customary for the <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/numbers\/how-much-cable-subscribers-pay-per-channel-1626\/\">cable TV operators\u00a0to pay networks<\/a> to carry their content.) \u00a0Now, those channels are currently playing a looping video\u00a0with Verizon spokespeople, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.verizon.com\/Support\/Residential\/content.htm?CMP=DMC-CVZ_ZZ_ZZ_Z_ZZ_N_Z133&amp;txid=B20141127_937642186\">urging subscribers to call Cox Media.<\/a><\/p>\n<address>Contrast this with Verizon&#8217;s stance toward Netflix,\u00a0where they want the opposite arrangement: \u00a0Netflix pays to deliver\u00a0content over Verizon&#8217;s network, <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/news\/articles\/SB10001424052702304899704579391223249896550\">citing<\/a> &#8220;<em>When one party\u2019s getting all the benefit and the other\u2019s carrying all the cost, issues will arise<\/em>&#8221; (Other ISPs share this view and Netflix has entered such an agreement with Comcast &amp; Verizon).<\/address>\n<address>This inconsistent situation is precisely and exactly why we need a neutral Internet.<\/address>\n<address>Payments flowing between ISPs and content providers distorts the market, introduces\u00a0friction, and shifts control\u00a0to the ISPs. \u00a0Ultimately, it hinders innovation: compare the closed, legacy platforms (cable TV, pre-smartphone cell phones) with the enormous economic, quality-of-life, and strategic benefits\u00a0of the new, open platforms (the Internet, smartphones). \u00a0If standing up a new Web site was\u00a0as hard as signing up cable TV providers for your new cable channel, or getting a carrier to carry your mobile app &#8220;on deck&#8221; (pre-smartphone), we&#8217;d be a fraction as advanced as we are today.<\/address>\n<address>Allowing business models for legacy,\u00a0closed\u00a0networks onto the Internet is a fundamental policy mistake. \u00a0If we go that way, how long until:<\/address>\n<address style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>Verizon is\u00a0sorry to inform you that {Netflix,Amazon,Battlefield,Youtube,etc.} will be unavailable (or available only at a reduced performance) because [content provider]\u00a0refused to accept content distribution rates in our customer&#8217;s best interests.<\/em><\/address>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I received an email from Verizon a few days ago, stating several FOX channels are\u00a0no longer available because &#8220;Verizon refused to accept an agreement that contained rates that are not in our customers\u2019 best interests&#8220;. \u00a0Presumably, FOX wanted more than &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/why-we-need-a-neutral-internet-exhibit-a\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-652","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/652","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=652"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/652\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":655,"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/652\/revisions\/655"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=652"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=652"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=652"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}