{"id":638,"date":"2014-07-28T13:45:11","date_gmt":"2014-07-28T13:45:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/?p=638"},"modified":"2017-09-09T11:57:10","modified_gmt":"2017-09-09T11:57:10","slug":"the-right-to-remember","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/the-right-to-remember\/","title":{"rendered":"The Right to Remember"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Earlier this year,\u00a0Mario Costeja-Gonz\u00e1lez won the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Right_to_be_forgotten\">right to be forgotten<\/a>. \u00a0The Court of Justice of the EU\u00a0ruled Google had to remove search results linking to a <a href=\"http:\/\/hemeroteca.lavanguardia.com\/preview\/1998\/01\/19\/pagina-23\/33842001\/pdf.html\">1998 newspaper article<\/a> about the foreclosure of his home (due to unpaid debts he later paid). \u00a0In the ultimate irony, he&#8217;s now permanently and widely remembered for precisely what he wanted everyone to forget (the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Streisand_effect\">Streisand Effect<\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Now, search engines must consider requests from individuals to remove search results that:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #252525;\">appear to be inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant or excessive in the light of the time that had elapsed\u00a0<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #252525;\">This raises the key question: \u00a0who judges this? \u00a0Something &#8220;irrelevant&#8221; to one person might be highly relevant\u00a0to another. \u00a0Not surprisingly, Google is making its point by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/business-28130581\">notifying Web sites when results are removed<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>This decision raises fundamental questions about the right to inform &amp; freedoms of speech and press. \u00a0The newspaper&#8217;s freedom to publish the foreclosure news is clearly protected, I am free to link to the news, and this blog post will eventually show up in search results. \u00a0It seems arbitrary that some have freedoms and some don&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>For better or worse, search technology has permanently changed the privacy calculus. \u00a0Since the dawn of time we&#8217;ve enjoyed &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.rcfp.org\/browse-media-law-resources\/news-media-law\/news-media-and-law-spring-2009\/out-sight-out-bounds\">practical obscurity<\/a>&#8220;, where a lot of personal information was hard to identify, locate,\u00a0or access. That&#8217;s changed, and legislators will now chase the issue with law and rulings in a never-ending game of <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Whac-A-Mole\">Whac-a-Mole<\/a>. For example, how long until someone finds ways to detect links that were removed and publishes them?<\/p>\n<p>(Given this new world, a far better strategy for Mr. <span style=\"color: #000000;\">Costeja-Gonz\u00e1lez would be to generate new content and bury the foreclosure news in the noise.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Internet never forgets; plan accordingly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Earlier this year,\u00a0Mario Costeja-Gonz\u00e1lez won the right to be forgotten. \u00a0The Court of Justice of the EU\u00a0ruled Google had to remove search results linking to a 1998 newspaper article about the foreclosure of his home (due to unpaid debts he &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/the-right-to-remember\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-638","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-policy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/638","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=638"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/638\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":640,"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/638\/revisions\/640"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=638"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/payne.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}